Understanding Moats in Crypto: Creating a Fortress

TechJD
6 min readNov 4, 2024

--

In competitive markets, a company’s moat determines its resilience. Traditional businesses build these protective barriers — often through network effects, switching costs, or economies of scale — over years. But in the crypto ecosystem, moats are radically different. Competition isn’t just fierce — it’s immediate, forkable, and incentivized. Blockchain’s open-source nature means a project can be copied in days, forcing crypto ventures to rethink how they build and protect long-term value. Here’s how moats are evolving in the DeFi space.

The Challenges of Building Moats in Crypto

Crypto companies face three unique challenges that make defensibility an ongoing battle:

  • Forkability: Open-source code makes it easy for new teams to create “forks,” or duplicate projects, often with minor tweaks and added incentives, increasing the pressure on original developers.
  • Composability: Crypto applications are interoperable, which lowers switching costs. Users can jump from one platform to another with little friction, making user retention difficult.
  • Token-Based Incentives: Token rewards attract users but also amplify user fluidity. When a competitor offers better incentives or yield opportunities, users can quickly switch, leaving the original project scrambling to retain engagement.

In this environment, any project that adds fees or reduces rewards risks losing users almost instantly. Here’s where the fundamental question arises: How can you build a true moat in a forkable world?

A New Framework for Moats in Crypto

Warren Buffett often evaluates companies with a simple question: “If I had a billion dollars, could I build a competitor that would take significant market share?” In crypto, we need a twist: If I fork this project and launch it with $50 million in token incentives, can I capture and keep its users?

This exercise exposes the fragility of many crypto projects:

  • If the answer is yes — the project’s user base could easily be poached by a competitor.
  • If the answer is no — the project likely has unique, hard-to-replicate qualities that provide real defensibility in the DeFi ecosystem.

Let’s break down what these qualities are and why they matter.

What Makes a Project Un-Forkable and Un-Subsidizable?

Consider Aave, a major decentralized lending platform. Aave’s moat isn’t flashy branding; it’s liquidity — the vast sums in its lending pools. For decentralized finance (DeFi), liquidity is a shield. New entrants can’t simply replicate Aave’s scale, which makes it harder to lure users away.

But even Aave’s moat isn’t bulletproof. Imagine a competitor forks Aave and offers $50 million in incentives to target its users. If this rival can match Aave’s liquidity, users might have little reason to return. Liquidity alone isn’t a guaranteed moat in crypto.

In reality:

  • For most decentralized lending protocols, liquidity is vulnerable. If a fork can match the liquidity, users may follow the better rewards.
  • This fluidity keeps the DeFi market dynamic, with user loyalty shifting like sand.

Front-Ends as the New Moat: Owning the User Relationship

If liquidity can be matched and users can switch easily, then controlling the user relationship might be the most powerful moat in crypto. Front-ends, like wallets and aggregators, act as the gateway between users and the crypto ecosystem. By managing this access point, they gain significant influence.

Take MetaMask, for example:

  • Beyond a Wallet: MetaMask isn’t just a wallet; it’s the first step for most users entering the Ethereum ecosystem.
  • Control of User Flow: This familiarity gives MetaMask pricing power, capturing fees from users who value convenience over cost savings.

In an environment where loyalty is fleeting, front-ends like MetaMask create a moat by becoming essential to users’ crypto interactions.

Data reveals a rising trend in crypto users opting for Telegram bots over traditional wallets, with weekly DEX trading volumes surpassing $100M at peak.

The Fat Wallet Thesis: How Wallets Capture Value

As competition intensifies, value in crypto may increasingly concentrate in wallets and front-ends. Wallets aren’t just storage solutions; they own crypto’s most valuable resource: order flow. Wallet providers have deep insights into user behavior, making them crypto’s ultimate gatekeepers.

This is the essence of the “Fat Wallet Thesis”:

  • Concentrated Value: Wallets and front-ends will capture more value over time, while protocols and DEXs become commoditized.
  • User Relationship: By controlling the initial interaction point, wallets establish themselves as winners in a forkable landscape.

Carving Out a Moat in Crypto Payment Processing

Ascendant Finance is finding its footing in the competitive web3 landscape through a strong focus on crypto payment processing. With its flagship product, CryptoCadet, Ascendant enables businesses to accept crypto payments seamlessly on platforms like WordPress and Shopify. This all-in-one tool streamlines payments, analytics, and security, making it easier for companies to transition into decentralized finance.

Key strengths that reinforce its position:

  • Effortless Payment Integration: CryptoCadet’s compatibility with popular platforms allows for quick and easy crypto payment setup.
  • Robust Security Measures: Solidity experts conduct rigorous audits, giving clients confidence in the security of their transactions.
  • Investor-Centric Tokenomics: Expertise in tokenomics designed to attract investors adds another layer of appeal for growth-focused web3 projects​.

By emphasizing secure and user-friendly payment solutions, Ascendant Finance is building a reliable moat in the crypto payment processing space.

DEXs vs. Aggregators: A Complex Battle for Moats

Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) have traditionally relied on liquidity as their moat. More liquidity means lower slippage and better pricing, drawing users in. But liquidity itself isn’t invincible. Aggregators now function as “intent-based” platforms, bypassing the need for massive on-chain liquidity by connecting to off-chain sources, like centralized exchanges (CEXs) and market makers.

Here’s the emerging shift in DEX defensibility:

  • Fragmenting Market: Wallets, Telegram bots, and aggregators are taking market share from traditional DEXs. User attention is moving towards platforms with the best execution, regardless of on-chain liquidity.
  • Evolving Interfaces: As demand shifts to user-friendly interfaces, traditional DEXs that rely on liquidity alone are at risk of losing their edge.

This trend suggests that owning liquidity may not be as strong a moat as once thought in the fast-evolving DeFi landscape.

Notice the big pink pie in the piechart? Well thats Uniswap thats just how big and strong there moat is

Innovation as the Ultimate Moat

For most crypto projects, the only truly defensible moat is continuous innovation like Polymarket. Liquidity and Total Value Locked (TVL) can be replicated; interfaces can be cloned. But a team that constantly rolls out new features creates a form of defensibility that’s harder to match.

Consider the example of Uniswap:

  • Resilience through Innovation: Uniswap survived a “vampire attack” from SushiSwap by continuing to evolve.
  • A Compelling User Experience: Projects like Hyperliquid have quickly gained traction, not just because of funding, but due to relentless improvement in user experience.

In a space where projects often feel interchangeable, constant development is addictive. Users don’t just stay for the current features; they stay for the anticipation of what’s next.

DefiLlama data reveals a significant shift in the Perp DEX landscape, with Hyperliquid now leading after surpassing dYdX and GMX.

Building a Moat in Crypto

In crypto, defensibility isn’t static; it’s an evolving challenge. Liquidity and TVL provide a foundation, but they’re only one part of the puzzle. Front-ends that control the user relationship and teams that embrace relentless innovation hold the strongest positions to build lasting value.

In an industry with low barriers to entry, a crypto moat isn’t a fortress; it’s a constant endeavor. Success isn’t about capturing market share — it’s about capturing the user’s journey through DeFi, shaping their experience, and building a moat that withstands time.

Paraea is an analyst with a rich background in finance, having worked at various research firms where he gained deep insights into investments and corporate strategies. Now, he blends this expertise with a unique perspective, crafting content for those venturing in finance, tech, or crypto. For more information check out ascendant.finance or join the Discord.

https://twitter.com/ascendantfi
https://twitter.com/cryptocadetapp
https://twitter.com/thetechjd

--

--

TechJD
TechJD

Written by TechJD

Law, programming, and everything in-between! Coming up with fun coding projects with real-world application.

No responses yet